Mail slow? View this month’s issue, right online!
Our digital version is easy to share with colleagues. See this month’s issue and digital versions of previous issues too.
Get your products and services in front of thousands of decision-makers. View our print and online advertising options.
A one-on-one interview conducted by our editorial team with industry leaders in our market.
Discover the newest promotions and collaborations within the industry.
Easy-to-digest data for your business.
Shampoos, conditioners, colorants and styling products created by leading industry suppliers.
Creams, serums, facial cleansers and more created by leading suppliers to the skincare industry.
Detergents, fabric softeners and more created by leading suppliers to the fabric care industry.
Eyeshadows, lipsticks, foundations and more created by leading suppliers to the color cosmetics industry.
Bodywashes, and bar and liquid soaps created by leading suppliers to the personal cleanser industry.
Hard surface cleaners, disinfectants and more created by leading suppliers to the home care industry.
Eau de parfums and eau de toilettes, body sprays, mists and more created by leading suppliers to the fragrance industry.
UV lotions and creams, self-tanners and after-sun products created by leading suppliers to the suncare industry.
A detailed look at the leading US players in the global household and personal products industry.
A detailed look at the leading players outside the US in the global household and personal products industry.
Looking for a new raw material or packaging component supplier? Your search starts here.
When you need a new manufacturing partner or private label company, get started here.
Who owns that? To keep track of leading brands and their owners, click here.
An annual publication, Company Profiles features leading industry suppliers with information about markets served, products, technologies and services for beauty, pesonal care and home care.
New products and technologies from some of the brightest minds in the industry.
A one-on-one video interview between our editorial teams and industry leaders.
Listen to the leading experts in the global household and personal products industry.
Comprehensive coverage of key topics selected by sponsors.
Detailed research on novel ingredients and other solutions for the global household and personal care industry.
Company experts explain what works and why.
Exclusive content created by our affiliates and partners for the household and personal care industry.
Exciting news releases from the household and personal care industry.
Our targeted webinars provide relevant market information in an interactive format to audiences around the globe.
Discover exclusive live streams and updates from the hottest events and shows.
Looking for a job in the household and personal care industry, search no further.
Follow these steps to get your article published in print or online
What are you searching for?
Issued in 2015, it would have restricted access by those under 18.
March 19, 2026
By: Christine Esposito
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is withdrawing a proposed rule, “General and Plastic Surgery Devices: Restricted Sale, Distribution, and Use of Sunlamp Products,” which was published in the Federal Register in 2015. The proposed rule would have imposed fuller restrictions on the use of tanning beds, including by individuals under the age of 18—a practice that is known to increase the chances of developing skin cancer.
The proposed rule would have also required all prospective users to read and sign a risk acknowledgement certification before using the devices, and require tanning facility operators to provide a user manual to users or prospective users upon request, as reported by Happi.
Both the American Academy of Dermatology and the Skin Cancer Foundation issued statements about the clawing back of the proposed rule.
The Agency’s change of direction prompted immediate pushback from skin health stakeholders.
Susan C. Taylor, MD, FAAD, president, American Academy of Dermatology, issued a formal statement that she was “disappointed” by FDA’s withdrawal of the proposed rule. In the statement, she cited the links between exposure to UV radiation from indoor tanning devices and the increased risk of melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, as well as nonmelanoma skin cancers, including squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma.
According to AAD, using tanning beds before age 20 can increase the risk of developing melanoma by 47%, and the risk rises with each use. Adolescents who begin indoor tanning before age 18 are also more likely to continue their behavior into adulthood.
“Restricting teens’ access to indoor tanning and informing the public about the dangers of indoor tanning are critical to preventing skin cancer. As medical doctors who diagnose and treat skin cancer, dermatologists are committed to reducing its incidence and saving lives. We encourage the reintroduction of the proposed rule by the FDA,” stated Dr. Taylor.
FDA said received more than 8,100 comments on the proposed rule from industry associations, medical and healthcare professional associations, law firms, cancer advocacy groups, and other interested parties, including individuals.
“In general, the comments discussed the dangers of UV radiation from sunlamp products; scientific aspects of the Proposed Rule; vulnerability of young people to the risks of sunlamp products; support for personal choice and parental decision-making; availability and relative safety of sunlamp product alternatives; and compliance burdens on small businesses,” FDA stated.
The Skin Cancer Foundation also shared its disappointment with the Agency, noting that it “strongly supports measures that discourage people from engaging in dangerous and potentially deadly indoor tanning practices, particularly when individuals are uninformed about the potential health hazards caused by the ultraviolet radiation emitted by these devices or when these individuals are not of an age to truly be able to consent to practices that can have long-term consequences to their health.”
According to data shared by the organization, those who begin tanning before age 35 increase their melanoma risk by almost 75%.
The Foundation cited a December 2025 paper from Northwestern Medicine and University of California, San Francisco entitled “Molecular effects of indoor tanning,” that presented study results showing people who use tanning beds have more DNA damage in their skin cells than people twice their age who don’t use tanning beds.
Deborah S. Sarnoff, MD, president of The Skin Cancer Foundation noted, “It is our hope that the FDA reviews the scientific evidence and reconsiders this decision. In the meantime, The Skin Cancer Foundation will continue to educate the public about the dangers of UV tanning beds.”
FDA, in its withdrawal announcement, said it “continues to consider regulatory initiatives” related to sunlamp products.
“The withdrawal of the Proposed Rule does not preclude the Agency from reinstituting rulemaking concerning the issues addressed in the proposal. Should we decide to undertake such rulemaking in the future, we will issue a proposed rule and provide a new opportunity for comment,” read a statement signed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
Kennedy is reportedly a user of tanning beds, as shown on Reddit.
Get the latest Happi news, insights and analysis in your Google Search and AI experiences.
Enter your account email.
A verification code was sent to your email, Enter the 6-digit code sent to your mail.
Didn't get the code? Check your spam folder or resend code
Set a new password for signing in and accessing your data.
Your Password has been Updated !